A big
theme at this year’s STEM Ed conference was Girls and Women in STEM, because
that pipeline is leaking way more females than males. Dr.
Elizabeth Croft of UBC, the final keynote speaker of the conference did a
fabulous presentation on the next generation of women in STEM. I enjoyed this presentation because even
though she has the studies to back up her claims, she spoke in a very
accessible way. She has the data to
support her, but didn’t bog us down with it.
She began
by presenting 3 myths that exist about women in STEM and her answers to them.
Myth 1: Boys have better math skills than girls.
http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/how_it_works.png |
They don’t;
as a population girls and boys are both good at math. But beyond that, math ability in boys doesn’t
predict their participation in STEM, particularly engineering. Yes, there are gender differences, but that
doesn’t preclude anyone from being successful in STEM. AND, the skills that many companies are
looking for in their engineers are precisely those that are traditionally
considered feminine – good communication skills, good team work and rapport,
organizational and problem solving skills….
Myth
2: Girls just aren’t interested.
Dr. Croft
believes that it’s not about innate interest, but how STEM has been marketed. Try this: Google “engineers” and take a look
at the images. Out of the first 10-20
images you see, how many women are there?
And this is an improvement! Dr.
Croft presented a variety of images from past UBC Engineering marketing
materials, and it was all boys/men, either in lab coats or hard hats. What affect does this have on young girls who
may have been interested in Engineering?
Myth 3:
STEM doesn’t need diversity.
Looking
at it from a business perspective – having more girls in STEM means that there
is a larger talent pool to draw from, which leads to increased innovation,
improved governance, and stronger financial.
Essentially: diverse team =
smarter team
She
suggests that the key to getting girls and women in STEM subjects is to make
people aware of the context behind STEM – what the real world problems are that
are being worked on. This information
isn’t just useful for girls, but for everyone, as parents and teachers have
huge influence on kids. It is also
incredibly important for girls to have female role models to look up to, and
learn from. Lastly, just like in real
life, the pipeline leaks at transition points – so mentorship programs and
community support and network could be useful tools to keep women.
Thomas
Meagher, of Owatonna Public Schools in the US looked at students in his
district in Grades 4-7 and found that they had positive attitudes towards STEM,
but were less positive about having a career in a STEM field. This research supports Dr. Croft’s points
about students not having context and any real idea of what the career opportunities
are. This again comes down to marketing,
and I believe, students’ overall lack of exposure to all careers in any detail,
even though we ask them to start choosing career and academic paths in high
school.
For more
discussions on women in STEM see this blog post from Aliens
Among Us or this
one by Anne Jolly.
BUT WHY????
Now…as a
class (with some help from a question posed in a session by Astrid Steele), we
have had a lot of discussion about WHY we want women in STEM in the first
place. I think this is a really
important discussion. Yes, a diverse
team will be more successful than a homogenous team, but that’s not really the
question being asked. It comes back to
David Blade’s presentation – why do we want ANYONE in STEM at all? Why is STEM so important to us right now?
It’s not
a simple answer, but I believe it comes from a long line of civilizations and
societies that were successful – aka able to survive – based on their
technological innovations. Access to
clean water, the ability to build buildings and transportation networks, and
communication technologies helped people to survive. And now “technological advancement” has
become synonymous with success. People
are only now starting to see the value in the indigenous, ‘old-fashioned’ way
of doing things (such as Peter Cole and Pat O’Riley of
UBC). However, the mainstream view is
still one of progress from technology.
We expect the future generation to save the world through technology we
haven’t worked out yet. No pressure,
right?
And what
about boys? Yes, it is incredibly
important for us to teach girls that they can be whatever they want, but we’re
not actually very good at being supportive of our boys to be whomever they
want, either.
Croft,
E. (2014, July). The next
generation of women in STEM: Making transformative change. Keynote presented at the 3rd
International Conference of STEM in Education, Vancouver, BC.
Meagher,
T. (2014, July). A look
at student attitudes and measured performance after a new STEM initiative’s
first year. Paper presented at the 3rd
International Conference of STEM in Education, Vancouver, BC.
No comments:
Post a Comment